REPORT 2001
How to Write the Report |The Eight Indicators |Templates|Bibliography|Annexes
GUIDELINES FOR OBSERVERS-REPORTERS
    References
    • 17 World Resources Institute (1998) World Resources 1998-1999, p. 178, Washington, DC. The Montreal Protocol phased out nearly all production of ozone-depleting substances in developed countries in 1996 but permitted production and use in developing countries to increase until 1999 with a gradual phase-out until 2010.

    •  
    • 18 See Bossel, Hartmut (1998), Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications, a report to the Balaton Group, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada, "http://iisd.ca" for a useful discussion of orientor star construction for displaying changes in a set of indicators.

    •  
    • 19 Houghton, J. T. et al eds (1996), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, p. xi.

    •  
    • 20World Resources Institute (1998), World Resources 1998-1999, pp. 67-72. McMichael, A. J. et al eds (1996), Climate Change and World Health, World Health Organisation, Geneva. And Watson, Robert T., Marufu C. Zinyowera, and Richard H. Moss (1996), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change, International Panel on Climate Change, published by Cambridge University Press.

    •  
    • 21In Article 2 of United Nations (1992), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva, "http://www.unfccc.org". Article 2 continues: "Such a level should be achieved within a time frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened, and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner."

    •  
    • 22IPCC members' estimates.

    •  
    • 23These Tier One (mostly OECD) countries have varying commitments ranging from -8% for the European Union as a whole, -7% for the United States, -6% for Japan and Canada, zero percent for New Zealand, Russia, and Ukraine, +1% for Norway, and +8% for Australia. United Nations (1997), Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Article 3; available via "http://www.unfccc.de".

    •  
    • 24Marland, Gregg, Tom Boden, Antoinette Brenkert, Bob Andres, and Cathy Johnston (1999), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) data available at "http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends".

    •  
    • 25"Net emissions from changes in tropical land-use" total 1.6 ± 1.0 GtC/yr ˜ 29% (aver. 1980-89). Houghton, J. T. et al eds (1996), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, op. cit., p. 17. The current global net is probably lower due to northern hemisphere forest regrowth and lower rates of tropical land clearing.

    •  
    • 26Houghton, J. T. et al eds (1996), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, op. cit., p. xi.²

    •  
    • 27Meaning: (your value X minus 339 kg/cap) divided by 791 kg/cap = your country's vector value.

    •  
    • 28U.S. CO2 emissions 1995 including bunkers but not cement manufacturing = 1.49706 trillion kg carbon divided by a population of 267.2 million (regression from 1998 data minus 0.8% per year; verify in U. S. Bu-reau of Census, 1998, Statistics of the United States). Carbon data from WRI (1998), World Resources 1998-1999, p. 344.

    •  
    • 29 Albania, same methodology and sources: 0.4767 billion kg carbon divided by 3.383 million people = 141 kgC per capita.