| 1998 REPORT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CANADA Report or GEO ProjectUniversity of British Columbia, Canada |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
Geography Demography Economic development A . Environmental Sustainability B . Social Sustainability C . Economic Sustainability D. Technological Sustainability Introduction GeographyCanada is the second largest country in the world, with a land area of 997 million hectares (1) . Only 4.6 percent of Canada's total land area is arable, however, and 1.6 percent is irrigated (2) . Canada has generous water resources, with 98.5 thousand m3 of internal renewable water per capita per year (3). Forests and woodlands accounted for nearly half of Canada's land in 1991, totaling 417.6 million hectares, and accounting for 10% of the world's total forest land (4) . In 1995, about 866 000 hectares of Canada's forests were clearcut harvested and another nearly 145 000 were cleared through selection harvesting and commercial thinning. In the same year, about 436 000 hectares were planted with trees (5) . Over the period 1992 through 1995, on average more than twice as many hectares were harvested as planted (6) . Major protected areas accounted for 8.9 percent of national territory in 1993 (7). There are approximately 3,500 publicly-owned protected areas, covering about 788,000 km2 with another 10,000 km2 held by non-government groups (8) .
DemographyCanada's population is about 29 million people (1994) and grew at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent from 1960-94 (9) . It is expected to grow at 0.9 percent between 1994 and the year 2000 (10) . Life expectancy at birth is 79 years (1994) (11) . Nearly all of adult Canadians (99 percent) are literate and there is 100 percent enrolment in primary and secondary school (12). Overall, Canada scores 0.960 for the United Nations Development Program's Human Development Index, ranking first among all countries of the world for this index (as of 1994) (13) . Most Canadians (77 percent, in 1994) live in urban areas (14) . All Canadians are served by municipal waste services and in 1990 each Canadian produced on average 660 kg of municipal waste (15) . Collectively, Canadians produced almost 7.8 millions tonnes of hazardous waste from 1991-94 (16).
Economic DevelopmentReal GDP per capita (using Purchasing Power Parities) was $21, 459 in 1994 (17) . Real earnings per employee grew at a very low rate between 1980 and 1992, averaging an annual increase of only 0.1 percent (18) .
Eight indicators of sustainability A . Environmental Sustainability1. Global environmental impacts Canadian CO2 emissions from fossil fuel use rose by about 9 percent from 1990 to 1995, and are expected to be 9.5 higher than 1990 levels by the year 2000 (19) . Canadian CO2 emissions account for about 2 percent of total global CO2 emissions, but, with only 0.5 percent of the world's population, Canada is a very high per capita emitter of CO2 (20) . In fact, in 1993 Canada was the fourth highest per-capita emitter of CO2 of all the OECD countries (21) . Canada is a signatory to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and to the Kyoto Protocol of the UNFCCC. Under the Kyoto Protocol, Canada has committed to reducing its total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 94 percent of 1990 levels by the years 2008-2012. Currently, federal policy on reducing GHG emissions centres on a Voluntary Challenge Program, in which GHG emitters register their actions to reduce emissions. This program is voluntary and is unlikely to be sufficient to meet Canada's commitments under the Kyoto Protocol (22) . In February 1998, the federal government established a Secretariat which will oversee a process of stakeholder consultation to develop a strategy for meeting Canada's commitments under the Protocol (23) .
2. Local environmental impacts Canadian NOx, VOCs and SO2 emissions all fell over the period 1990 to 1995. Canada has established a number of agreements and commitments with respect to these emissions. In 1990, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment adopted the NOx /VOC Management Plan, which is "aimed at reducing ozone in Canada to values less than the maximum acceptable air quality objective (82-ppb one-hour average) by the year 2005" (26) . Included in this program are, among other initiatives, standards for vehicle emissions and cleaner diesel and gasoline, emission guidelines for large stationary sources (27) . In 1985, the federal government and seven eastern Canadian provincial governments established the Canadian Acid Rain Control Program. Under this program, participating provinces agreed to reduce their collective SO2 emissions to 2.3 million tonnes by 1994, a target which was exceeded in 1993: total eastern Canadian SO2 emissions in 1994 were 1.7 million tonnes, representing a 56 percent decline from 1980 levels (28) . In 1991, Canada and the US signed the Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement. Under this agreement, Canada agreed to establish, by the year 2000, a permanent national limit on SO2 emissions of 3.2 million tonnes and a 10 percent reduction in NOx emissions from stationary sources (29) . In April 1997, Prime Minister Chretien and US President Clinton agreed to develop a Joint Plan of Action Addressing Transboundary Air Pollution, pursuant to the Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement, which will focus on ground-level ozone and particulates (30) .
B . Social Sustainability3. Rural electrification Very nearly all Canadian households have access to electricity (99.6 percent in 1995, which is only very slightly higher than in 1990). Household energy prices have risen considerably in the last decade. The overall residential energy price index in 1995 was more than twice its value in 1986 and 35 percent higher than the 1990 value. Efficiency adjusted residential fuel oil and natural gas prices increased only slightly from 1990 to 1995, by about 6 and 7 percent, respectively. Electricity prices, on the other hand, grew by almost 55 percent over the same period (35).
4. Employment intensity Employment in the energy sector is a fairly insignificant part of total employment in Canada: representing about 1.4 percent of total employment in 1996. In contrast, investment in energy accounted for nearly 15 percent of total investment in Canada in 1996. This difference is reflected in the number of jobs per million dollars invested which is an order-of-magnitude lower in the energy sector than in the economy as a whole. Further, while the number of jobs per million dollars invested increased slightly from 1990 to 1996 for the whole economy, it actually fell slightly in the energy sector. The energy sector does slightly better in terms of jobs created (37) per million dollars invested: it is still an order-of-magnitude lower than in the economy as a whole, but this measure increased significantly from 1990 to 1996. However, the single year estimate (1996) masks considerable variation in job creation in the energy sector. While the number of jobs in the energy sector rose in 1996 from the previous year, it fell from the previous year in 1995 and 1997 (by approximately 1000 and 6000 jobs, respectively).
Canada is a net energy exporter. Energy exports accounted for just over 2 percent of total exports in 1997, down slightly from the 1990 share.
The Canadian federal government has traditionally been a significant
investor in energy development, particularly in conventional sources like
fossil fuels. In recent years, however, the government has begun to reduce
its investment levels. As can be seen in the above table, federal government
investment in conventional energy sources dropped by half from 1990 to
1996 and appears to continue to be dropping (in fiscal year 1998/99 federal
spending on conventional energy sources will be $124.6 million, nearly
a 50 percent reduction from the previous year (44)
). Federal spending on unconventional sources such as alternative and
renewable energy has remained fairly constant over the 1990s at just over
$30 million. In fiscal year 1988/99 it will be $31.2 million (45)
.
Tables C-1 and C-2 below show detailed breakdowns of federal government spending on conventional energy and unconventional energy, respectively. As can be seen in Table C-1, a large proportion of federal support for conventional energy has gone to petroleum megaprojects and nuclear energy. However, support levels for both have fallen over the 1990s, although support to nuclear energy is still significant at $100 million in fiscal year 1998/99.
7. Energy productivity Over the period 1990 to 1995, the energy productivity of the Canadian economy increased slightly, by less than 3 percent. Energy use increased in all sectors of the Canadian economy over this period, but GDP grew by a larger amount, resulting in an increase in the measure GDP/energy use. In the residential sector, the use of energy per household declined significantly between 1990 and 1995 due largely to improvements in space heating and appliance energy efficiencies. This was offset, however, by an increase in the number of households so that overall energy use in this sector increased by 4 percent (51) . Similarly, energy intensity in the commercial sector declined by 2.6 percent over this period, due to improved energy efficiency of buildings and equipment and better energy management practices (as well as a decline in occupancy rates). This was offset, however, by an increase of over 10 percent in floor area, leading to an increase in overall commercial sector energy use of 9 percent (52) . Passenger transportation energy use increased over this period by almost 9 percent, largely due to an increase in passenger-kilometres. The average fuel economy of light passenger vehicles improved by almost 4 percent from 1990 to 1995, but this was partially offset by a trend towards heavier vehicles such as Sport Utility Vehicles (53) . There was also a small shift in mode from rail to road which increased energy use slightly (because road transport tends to be more energy-intensive than rail) (54) . Freight transportation energy use increased by 6.4 percent, due to increased activity (tonne-kilometres) and a shift from marine and rail to trucks (trucking tends to be more energy-intensive). This shift reflects the advent of "just-in-time" delivery which favours trucking over other modes as well as a shift in production from bulk commodities to manufactured products (55) . The increase in activity and shift to more energy-intensive modes was partially offset by improvements in energy intensity (56). Industrial energy use increased by about 9 percent, due to an increase
of almost 6 percent in industrial activity (GDP) and a shift in the composition
of production towards more energy-intensive industries (57)
. Overall industrial energy intensity increased by about 1 percent, but
there were significant improvements in some industries such as pulp and
paper, iron and steel, aluminum and cement, largely due to technological
improvements (58) .
Over the period 1990 to 1995, the share of renewables and conservation in total primary energy consumption nearly doubled. It is, however, still fairly low, at less than 10 percent. The share of renewables increased about 1 percent from 1990 to 1995, to a share of 5.8 percent. For many applications, the price of renewables is barely competitive with more conventional sources (compare Tables D-1 and D-2 below). Canada's National Energy Board finds that barriers to development of renewable energy sources include "land use requirements, high initial capital costs, small and fragmented industry, procedures for environmental assessment and licensing, and the intermittent nature of the energy supplied from several of the renewable sources" (61) . In their outlook for energy supply in Canada to the year 2010, the National Energy Board of Canada does not expect the contribution of renewables to total energy supply to "change notably" (62) . Similarly, Natural Resources Canada finds that the contribution of renewables to electricity generation will increase to only 3 percent by 2020 (63) . Table C-2 above shows federal
government spending on alternative energy and renewables and conservation.
Spending levels have remained fairly constant over the 1990s, in the range
of $21-25 million per fiscal year, and well below spending on conventional
energy sources such as fossil fuels and nuclear electricity.
Bibliography Canadian Global Change Program (1996). Canada and Climate Change: Responding to Challenges and Opportunities. A submission to Canada's Provincial and Federal Ministers of Energy and Environment. November. Environment Canada (1998). "Reinforcing Canada's action plan on climate change". Press release dated February 11, 1998. Website:http://www.doe.ca/press/cc-plan_n_e.htm) Environment Canada (1997a). "Ottawa unveils next steps on smog". Press release dated November 7, 1997. Website:http://www.ec.gc.ca/press/smog1_n_e.htm Environment Canada (1997b). "Backgrounder: Federal Smog Management Plan, Phase Two". November 7, 1997. Website:http://www.ec.gc.ca/press/smog1_b_e.htm Environment Canada (1996a). "Canadian 1996 NOX/VOC Science Assessment. Executive Summary". Website:http://www.ec.gc.ca/phase2/science_e.htm Environment Canada (1996b). "Canada's National Environmental Indicator Series: Acid Rain". Website:http://199.212.18.79/~ind/English/AcidRain/Bulletin/ar_iss_e.htm Hornung, Robert (1998). "The Voluntary Challenge Program Will Not Work". Policy Options, 19(4): 10-13 National Energy Board (1994a). Canadian Energy Supply and Demand 1993-2010. Technical Report. Calgary: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. National Energy Board (1994b). Canadian Energy Supply and Demand 1993-2010. Appendix to Technical Report. Calgary: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. Natural Resources Canada (1997a). Canada's Energy Outlook: 1996-2020. Energy Forecasting Division, Energy Policy Branch, Energy Sector, Natural Resources Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada. April. Natural Resources Canada (1997b). Energy Efficiency Trends in Canada 1990 to 1995. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. Organisation for Economic Coordination and Development (1995). OECD Environmental Data Compendium 1995. Paris: OECD. United Nations Development Programme (1997). Human Development Report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||