General Discussion:
Most Significant Energy-Related Local Pollutant(s) Vector:
- 1 : 1990 level of the selected pollutant per capita
- 0 : one-tenth of the 1990 per capita level
Selecting the indicator for the most significant local environmental
pressure is best done by local Observer-Reporters. Choose a pollutant
that strongly impacts local human or environmental health (including
impacts on human respiratory, reproductive, and immunity, and on
forestry, lakes and rivers, agriculture, domestic animals, fisheries,
or infrastructure). Such pollution sources are frequently related
to industry, mining, fuel refineries, manufacturing, or electric
powerplants. Non-point pollution sources such as vehicles often
pose the greatest hazard to health, are often difficult to mitigate,
and their emission rates might be a valuable indicator, too. Observer-Reporters
may decide to use ambient air or water pollution concentrations
as the standard (as we did in Example #2 below), in which case
we recommend changing the vector to 1 = World Health Organisation
guideline and 0 = two-tenths WHO guideline for each pollutant.
Our example combines and averages two air pollutants (particulates
and SO2).
Common energy-related pollutants and their principal impacts
include:
- Sulfur dioxide SO2 (principally from coal-fired
powerplants, smelters, and industry) causing acid precipitation;
- Nitrogen oxides NOx (principally from vehicles
and powerplants) causing smog;
- Ozone O3 (a secondary pollutant formed by nitrogen
dioxide and hydrocarbons in sunlight);
Carbon monoxide (principally from incomplete combustion in motor
vehicle engines and boilers);Heavy metals (air or water pollution,
principally from mining and powerplants);Particulate air pollutants
(principally from fossil-fired powerplants, vehicles, road dust,
and industry) causing respiratory diseases;Volatile organic compounds
VOCs (principally from gasoline and other fuels, but also of particular
concern inside buildings [e.g., from paints, sealants, adhesives]);Uranium,
plutonium, and other radio-active substances (principally from
uranium mining and processing, nuclear materials transport, fission
reactors, and nuclear powerplant accidents or routine leakage,
but, in terms of exposure, measured in becquerels, principally
natural background radiation and medical x-rays.Lead (principally
from leaded fuels for motor vehicles);Indoor air pollution (typically
particulates, brown smoke, carbon monoxide from cooking and space
heating, primarily from biomass and coal burned indoors).
Urban pollution from vehicles, powerplants, and industry is already
horrific in many cities, and is expected to double in the next decade
in many urban areas of developing countries, according to the World
Health Organisation. Coal use is projected to increase by more than
50%, with most of the increase in developing countries where energy
expansion will outpace use of pollution control technology. A useful
source of information and references is the World Resources Institute's
World Resources 1998-1999, which focuses much of its discussion
on environmental and societal health. A combined index of two
or more pollutants may make sense in some countries in order to
measure pollutants that impact two or more systems-perhaps one
of urban human health significance and another of rural or environmental
importance. Observer-Reporters should be sure to select pollutants
that are both significant and persistent to ensure validity and
long-term tracking for the index. Carefully and completely note
the details of such a pollutant combination for future Observer-Reporters,
including data sources, your rationale for choosing the combination,
and precisely how the indicator and its vector are calculated.
If you choose to use ambient pollution concentrations rather than
emissions per capita for this indicator, carefully note the details
for the SEW Secretariat and future Observer-Reporters.
top of file
Examples:
An example of a single pollutant:
United States 1990: 57.2 kg of SO2
per capita and 1996: 42.8 kg SO2 per capita. The
center, the sustainability objective, is one-tenth of 1990 =
5.7 kg SO2 per capita. The 0 to 1 vector value equals
1990 minus one-tenth of 1990 = 57.2 minus 5.7 = 51.5 kg SO2
per capita. The actual vector value for the U.S. in 1996 is
therefore the 1996 metric of 42.8 divided by the unit vector
of 51.5 = 0.8311. The U.S. reduced its sulfur emissions principally
through market-oriented approaches such as tradable emission
permits, which reduced emissions faster and at a fraction of
the anticipated cost
An example of using ambient pollutant concentrations and
of combining two pollutants in one indicator:
China, 1995: combine urban particulate concentrations
and urban sulfur dioxide concentrations in Beijing. Change the
indicator metric to 1 = 1.0 WHO guideline for each pollutant
and 0 = 0.20 of the WHO guideline for each pollutant. WHO guideline
for Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) = 50 m gr/m3;
SO2 = 60 m gr/m3 (CK, see WRI, p. 117).
Ambient levels in Beijing in 1995 for TSP = 377 m gr/m3;
and for SO2 = 90 m gr/m3. Hence the zero
to one segment for TSP = 10 to 50 m gr/m3 (therefore
= 40) and for SO2 = 12 to 60 m gr/m3 (therefore
= 48). Beijing's 1995 TSP metric of 377 converts to 377/40 =
9.43. Beijing's 1995 SO2 metric of 90 m gr/m3
converts to 90/48 = 1.88. Giving equal weight to each pollutant
measure yields a combined vector of (9.43 + 1.88)/2 = 5.66.
top of file |